|
PC enthusiasts; or should I
say PC extremists, are always searching for new ways of pushing their systems
to new heights. The newest motherboard, the fastest CPU, and the most exotic
cooling techniques are all in the arsenal of the user willing to claim the
bragging rights associated with having the best. And the best is what
ExtremeMhz will be discussing today…the best memory that is. As we all know,
even when employing the aforementioned strategies, unless premium quality
memory is used, maximum performance will remain elusive.
A while
back we compared the performance of multiple flavors of the Corsair XMS series
memory modules, and their performance relative to our reference Crucial brand
memory. As expected, the Crucial memory performed admirably, but it could not
keep up with the Corsair modules when subjected to the most stressful of
conditions. The winner of the competition came as no surprise; the Corsair
XMS3200 led the pack and maintained a commanding lead over Crucial and its XMS
siblings. Today, ExtremeMhz will throw the XMS series 3500 into the mix to
see what new levels of performance can be achieved.

The
specific module we will be testing is the CMX512-3500C2

Features
The
specs directly from Corsair:
|
Size |
512MB |
|
Rated Speed |
434MHz |
|
DIMM Width |
8 Bytes |
|
Latency Rating |
2-3-3-7-T1 |
|
Organization |
64M x 64 |
|
Package |
184 DIMM |
|
Other |
Aluminum Heat
Spreader |
Among
the features listed, latency ratings are the most relevant with respect to
performance. Of these, CAS is the most important. Column Address Strobe or
CAS refers to the measure of time (in nanoseconds) required for data transfer
to occur after the memory's chipset controller issues a read command. It
stands to reason that a lower CAS rating will produce better overall system
performance due to the reduction in time related to data transfer. However,
the actual performance gain is not directly proportional to the decrease in
CAS rating. The relative level of performance varies between motherboard
manufacturers, and indeed from board to board due to the fact that trace
delays are not consistent throughout.
With DDR
memory, its bus speed is a value equal to 2 X FSB speed. The XMS 3500 module
is rated to perform at FSB speeds of 217 MHZ. The 3500 designation is derived
by multiplying the memory's bus speed rating (in this case 434) by the
module's DIMM width (8 bytes).
Testing
The test
configuration we used is as follows:
|
Motherboard |
Albatron PX845PEV
Pro |
|
Processor |
Intel 2.4G P4
(Using stock cooling) |
|
HDD |
Western Digital
300BB (30G, 7200 RPM) |
|
OS |
Windows 2000
Professional (SP2) |
|
Video Card |
Generic Geforce2 |
|
Optical Drives |
None |
|
Floppy Drive |
None |
The
testing methodology:
We used
Sisoft Sandra 2003 as the benchmark tool for measuring the XMS 3500's
performance relative to other memory modules. The contenders are:
-
Crucial 2100
-
Corsair XMS2700
-
Corsair XMS3000
-
Corsair XMS3200
Note 1: All the modules used
are rated to perform at CAS 2 settings.
Note 2: All the modules used
are 256MB. The XMS3500 is 512MB.

Due to
the high quality of the memory modules used in the tests, we decided to tweak
the memory settings in the Albatron motherboard's BIOS to the following:
Note 3:
The above mentioned settings were kept constant for all tests conducted.
The
first portion of the test involved capturing the Ram Int Buffered (RIB) scores
at default CPU settings for each module. For the second part of the test, we
measured the RIB scores for each module after achieving the maximum respective
CPU overclock for each.
|