Reviews

 

Extras    
Articles

 

Extras
 
   

 

 

Memory from Crucial.com

 

 find reviews:    

Neoseeker

 

AMDBoard

GideonTech

Gizmodo

[H]ardOCP

Hardware-HQ

HiTechMods

Hot Hardware

ModTown

PCeXtremist

PCHardwareMods

PCReviewSpot

PCStats

Pheaton

SubZeroTech

TechSeekers

Tech Talk

ThinkComputers

Tweak3D

Twisted Mods

ViperLair

Virtual Hideout

V-Underground

Voided Warranty

WesleyTech

 

Overclockers

 

3DChip

 

RipNet

Tech-PC

WorldOC

 

Hard-h2o

 

 

Recognition

 

 

Link To Us

 

 

 

Kingmax Hardcore Series DDR500 Memory Review
 

 

Before we move on to overclocking and performance, let's take a quick look at our test system.

 

Motherboard: Soyo Dragon 2 875P Platinum
CPU: Pentium 4 2.8GHz
Video Card: ATI Radeon 9600
Hard Drive: WD Raptor 10K SATA 36GB
Cooling: Swiftech MXC478-V w/ HS 80mm fan

 

Overclocking

 

For our overclocking tests, we used a 1:1 ratio to determine the highest stable memory overclock.  Hyper-Threading was enabled and performance on the Soyo Dragon 2 was set to normal.  To determine stability, I ran Sisoftware's Sandra 2004 Burn-In Wizard (CPU & Memory Benchmarks) a total of 10 times under normal setting.  The maximum stable overclock achieved was 245FSB, which is slightly under its rated 500MHz capability.  Although we actually were able to run at 250MHz, it just wasn't stable enough for us to consider it its maximum stable overclock.  Anything above 245FSB, and things started getting a bit flakey.  Even changing the CPU:DRAM ratio did not aid in reaching its rated top speed.  Now, this does not mean this is not good memory.  In fact, it is very good memory.  We will show you why Kingmax Hardcore Series managed to really impress us in our performance tests.

 

But can they run at 500MHz?

 

Well, as we mentioned in our Corsair review, the answer depends on what motherboard you pair them with.  Like the Corsair modules, you can likely achieve 500MHz with an Asus P4C800-E motherboard.  However, we like to use a different Canterwood motherboard in order to provide you with more realistic results. 

 

Sandra 2004 Memory Benchmarks

 

In addition to measuring its performance, we threw the Corsair TwinX4000Pro series in for comparison.  Tests were run both at stock speed and maximum OC.  Now, before we show you the performance results, I would like to add that these modules performed better thanks to the more aggressive timings I was able to set them at both at stock and maximum OC.  Unlike the TwinX4000Pro, I was able to run them solid at 2.5-3-3-7.  You will see the difference in our tests.

 

 

Even at 400MHz, they managed to outperform the TwinX4000 modules thanks to the lower timings.

 

 

Again, the Kingmax memory takes the lead.  Overall, these memory modules were clearly faster than Corsair in our Sandra tests running at the same speeds.  I was not only surprised with the results, but impressed as well.

 

 

 

Next: Final Tests & Conclusions

 

Printer Friendly Version

 
 
 


about this site l contact l privacy policy

 

Articles

 

 

antivirus
Bullguard Antivirus