Extras   Reviews  
Articles

 

Extras
 
   

 

 

Memory from Crucial.com

 

 find reviews:    

Neoseeker

 

AMDBoard

GideonTech

Gizmodo

[H]ardOCP

Hardware-HQ

HiTechMods

Hot Hardware

ModTown

PCeXtremist

PCHardwareMods

PCReviewSpot

PCStats

Pheaton

SubZeroTech

TechSeekers

Tech Talk

ThinkComputers

Tweak3D

Twisted Mods

ViperLair

Virtual Hideout

V-Underground

Voided Warranty

WesleyTech

 

Overclockers

 

3DChip

 

RipNet

Tech-PC

WorldOC

 

Hard-h2o

 

 

Recognition

 

 

Link To Us

 

 

 

16x DVD+-RW Double Layer DVD Writer Comparison Guide
 

 

DVD Read Tests

 

In our DVD read tests, I'll be testing both single and dual layer DVDs.  For the dual layer tests, I will be testing both PTP and OTP discs.  We'll also do a comparison with recordable media as well.  Let's start with transfer rates.

 

Remember that a majority of these drives have rip locks on them and the results may not be too impressive.  However, this will allow you to compare each of them to see which drive/s have the most excessive locks and give you a good indication of what to expect if used for ripping. 

 

Read Transfer Rates

 

 

No drive on the market can compete with Lite-On's 16x drive when it comes to single layer DVD-Video discs.  Their drives do not have a rip lock and therefore, you'll be able to obtain much higher transfer rates.  You can see that it does offer true 16x transfer on single layer discs with an average speed of 12x.  The LG GSA-4160B doesn't do bad though and offers substantially higher transfer speeds than both the NEC and Pioneer models. 

 

 

In our dual layer read tests, we see the Lite-On and LG drive on par in terms of the highest transfer rates.  What I found particularly disappointing about the NEC and Pioneer models were the extremely excessive limitations put forth in the firmware.  The rip lock was just intolerable actually.  Something to seriously consider for those whose primarily goal is to rip/backup your DVDs.

 

 

As expected, we see some higher numbers with OTP discs.  The Lite-On and LG drives again take a strong lead over its competitors.

 

 

With recordable media, it's quite a different story.  The NEC ND-3500A is simply unmatched and takes a strong lead above the rest.  However, the Pioneer and LG drives do offer some acceptable performance with recordable media.

 

Seek Times

 

So which drive had the lowest seek times?  Let's find out by testing with both single and dual layer DVD-Video discs.

 

 

The LG GSA-4160B and Lite-On SOHW-1633s have the lowest seek times.  The Pioneer drive would have the highest and most disappointing scores. 

 

 

We again see both the LG and Lite-On models showing the lowest seek times with dual layer PTP discs.  However, things change a bit when comparing both the NEC and Pioneer drives. 

 

 

We see similar results when testing with OTP dual layer discs.  The LG providing the lowest seek times when compared to all others.

 

Overall, the LG-GSA4160B is once again the leader, offering the lowest seek times out of the bunch. 

 

CPU Usage

 

 

With single layer DVD discs, the LG and Lite-On drives were able to go through all tests, including at 8x speeds.  The LG showed the lowest usage.

 

 

With dual layer PTP discs, the LG once again showed the lowest utilization.  We see a jump though with the NEC drive at 4x. 

 

 

The Pioneer seems to handle OTP discs slightly better but the LG drive continues to show low usage.  Overall, the LG GSA-4160B performs best in these tests.

 

 

Next: CD Write Tests

 
 

Printer Friendly Version

 
 
 


about this site l contact l privacy policy

 

Articles

 

 

antivirus
Bullguard Antivirus